Julius Caesar Rhetoric Analysis - 1228 Words

The play Julius Caesar is deeply rooted in Shakespeare’s characteristic methods of rhetoric and persuasion. This play is primarily driven by the technique of persuasion when Cassius has convinced Brutus that must die. This sets the story in motion; however, the plot ending is determined by Antony’s speech to the people. Shakespeare’s method of rhetoric has been the most powerful usage of words and writing, creating the opportunity to collapse kingdoms and rise anew. Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar scrutinizes the power of rhetoric by rivaling two speeches, Brutus verses Mark Antony. In the end, it is shown that Antony’s rhetoric to be clearly greater as his effect on the people’s receival is supportive. Clearly, Antony does not have the†¦show more content†¦We know what is in store upon the private utterings of Antony â€Å"O, pardon me, thou bleeding piece of earth, That I am meek and gentle with these butchers! (III. ii. 269-270). Brutus’ speech was equally compelling. He uses Pathos creating appeal for the peoples love of Rome â€Å"Romans, country men and lovers†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (III. ii. 12-13). Ethos when calling the people his fellow countrymen, saying he has honor and they have wisdom â€Å"Believe me for mine honor, have respect to mine honor that you shall believe. Censure me in your wisdom†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (III. Ii. 15-17). He declares no crime is committed with the statement â€Å"†¦This is my answer: not that I loved Caesar less-but that I loved Rome more† (III. ii.20-22), this announcement is his example of logos, a crime for the greater good of Rome. Cesar is wise and loving he claims which is unwritten irony as he truly does not mean it. His rhetoric questions are, Who is here so rude that would not be a Roman? (III. ii.31-32). Brutus speech was agreeably received as the people cheered him on. Brutus speech permanently fails to successfully win the people over because he does not appreciate or understand them. Largely his failure starts at the beginning when asking the people to, â€Å"Censure me in your wisdom, and wake your senses† (III. Ii. 17-18). His failure to realize that the people are an angry mob and wisdom is lacking due to the shared anger. His argument is delivered coldly and with calculating reasoning. His argument ofShow MoreRelatedRhetoric and Betrayal in Julius Caeser Play1486 Words   |  6 PagesWilliam Shakespeare’s famous play Julius Caesar utilizes the literary element of rhetoric multiple times throughout to show the true power that words can hold. The rhetoric in Caesar accompanies the play’s themes of betrayal, deception, and exaggeration. Brutus uses rhetoric to persuade the crowd of plebeians that the murdering of Caesar was positive and beneficial to all of Rome, winning their support and causing them to join his cause. Soo n after, Mark Antony gives a terrifically-persuasive speechRead MoreThe Power Of Words : Julius Caesar1218 Words   |  5 PagesThe Power of Words (Major Assignment: Julius Caesar Analysis) Initially, the thought of having at least a dynamic character with some sort of clemency to live from their mistakes would be conspicuous in most analogies, but â€Å"Julius Caesar,† written by William Shakespeare, is no exception. This tragedy took place in an era where mythological divinities were once believed; hence, this play settled across the capital of Rome, Italy. According to Aristotle, tragedy has six main elements: plot, characterRead MoreThe Role of Persuasion in Julius Caesar Essay examples1066 Words   |  5 PagesJulius Caesar Topic: Write an expository essay on the role of persuasion in the play. Julius Caesar is a tragic drama written by William Shakespeare in 1599. This tragedy takes place in ancient Rome around 44 B.C when Rome was a great empire. Julius Caesar was a very important figure at this time as he was a very successful general who helped spread the Roman Empire and after his defeat of his political rival Pompey, he took on the role of becoming a dictator of Rome. But many citizens â€Å"fearedRead MoreRhetorical Analysis of Antonys Speech 3.2842 Words   |  4 PagesRhetorical Analysis of Antony’s Speech In Julius Caesar, Mark Antony is given the opportunity to speak at Caesar’s funeral by the conspirators the murdered him. Through his words, Antony seeks to cause dissent and let mischief reign over his audience, the plebeians of Rome. Antony uses rhetorical questioning to provoke the crowd into a fit of rage over Brutus’ words. Antony disguises his true intents in his speech, putting him at a moral high ground over Brutus. He finally uses ambiguous meaningsRead MoreA Historical Overview Of Julius Caesar Essay1452 Words   |  6 PagesA Historical Overview of Julius Caesar (Shakespeare style) The fate of a nation determined by one man. With classic alliances and betrayals, the tale of Julius Caesar is still regarded as one of the greatest betrayals in human history. The fate of Rome was heading toward a dictatorship. Only the Roman Republic could stop Julius Caesar from ruling Rome. Little did the Roman Republic know that this assassination would later cause Octavian Caesar to become the first Emperor of the Roman Empire in 27Read MoreWilliam Shakespeares Julius Caesar - Mark Antony Proves to Be the Most Skilful Politician in the Play. Do You Agree?1238 Words   |  5 PagesWilliam Shakepeares Julius Caesar Mark Antony proves to be the most skilful politician in the play. Do you agree? Power is the ability to influence the behaviour of others - whether this is achieved with or without resistance, for good or for bad. Some would go as far as to say that all human behaviour is propelled by the want of power. One can conclude, however, that power is inevitable in the human society. It’s natural. William Shakespeare’s play, Julius Caesar, is brimming with humansRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s Julius Caesar And Richard II Essay2239 Words   |  9 PagesShakespeare’s Julius Caesar and Richard II are plays of tremendous interest for their political discourse. The commons play a lesser, but no less significant, role in this presentation of competing political and social ideologies. Shakespeare’s treatment of the commoners in both plays is thought provoking in both their similarities and differences. In Richard II they are gifted with intellect, empathy and resolve, while in Julius Caesar they are a fickle collective lacking independence and reas oningRead MoreJulius Caesar by William Shakespeare2100 Words   |  9 Pagesthe play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Mark Antony is depicted as a better leader than Brutus, due to his cunning use of rhetoric when addressing the plebeians after Caesar’s death. This essay will be divided into two sections to explore the ways in which Antony is depicted as better leader. The First section will contextualise the extracts used for analysis, and compare Brutus’s pedestrian speech with Mark Antony’s impressive oratory. This will be done by defining what rhetoric is, and howRead MoreJulius Caesar Essay1878 Words   |  8 PagesA friend of Caesar. Antony claims allegiance to Brutus and the conspirators after Caesar’s death in order to save his own life. Later, however, when speaking a funeral oration over Caesar’s body, he spectacularly persuades the audience to withdraw its support of Brutus and instead condemn him as a traitor. With tears on his c heeks and Caesar’s will in his hand, Antony engages masterful rhetoric to stir the crowd to revolt against the conspirators. Antony’s desire to exclude Lepidus from the powerRead MoreA Teacher Who Received The Teacher Of The Year Award From Woodbridge High School768 Words   |  4 Pagesand historical writing with Julius Caesar). She selects the instructional materials/techniques from her past experiences, which over the years, has accumulated as a pile of â€Å"bulletproof† methodologies. And by knowing her student diverse level of composition skills, she adjusts the difficulty sets of her linguistics and rhetoric lectures. As for students, several assessment techniques are effective in determining their subject mastery: writing homework, reading analysis, and tests. The teacher uploads